[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Pelosi Joins White House in Approval of Big Three Bailout

Published 09/10/08 Craig Harrington - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org

The White House, both Presidential candidates and now the House of Representatives seem likely to approve a multibillion dollar bailout package to Detroit-based automakers, according to The Free Press.

The proposed package would amount to $50 billion in loans to General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, all of which have struggled amid lagging sales and massive debt. The automakers have argued that they require government assistance if they are to retool their manufacturing to emphasis the small, light, fuel-efficient cars of the future and regain their competitiveness with brands such as Toyota and Honda.

The government approved $25 billion in loans to automakers in last year’s energy plan, but that money was never made available. The new plan would call for $50 billion over three years; $25 billion the first year, $15 billion the second and $10 billion the third. This planned proposal would charge the automakers an interest rate of just 5 percent, as opposed to the 20 percent or higher commercial lenders would charge.

The loan package is hoped to provide sustainable stability to the already greatly undermined industry and potentially protect thousands of American jobs. However, the responsibility of such a spending plan has to be questioned. The U.S. government not only runs budget deficits nearly every year, but it has accumulated debt over the last 50 years amounting to trillions of dollars.

The United States has no money to loan anyone, even for a project as seemingly important as this one. The U.S. must first borrow money from another country willing to finance our spending, and then turn around and loan that money away. This plan would not just cost the government $50 billion; it would cost the U.S. $50 billion plus interest over many years. Without a balanced budget, any major government program will simply cost the U.S. much more in the long-run.

Source The Free Press:

The Bush administration took a step Tuesday toward backing up to $50 billion in loans sought by the auto industry on the same day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she'd push for approval of the aid package.

The U.S. Department of Energy said it had begun writing the rules for how the money would be lent, a move that makes it more likely that the industry could start borrowing during the next few months, if it can navigate the election-year politics on Capitol Hill and gain the president's full support.

Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House, said the loans could pass as part of several bills, including an energy package, a second economic stimulus proposal or, as a last resort, attached to the funding bill that will keep the federal government running into the next administration.


Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems:

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Additional Recommended Articles


Comment on this article

Subject

Comment


Article Comments From Readers

guest says "To the previous guest - I did not realize that Rebublicans were Liberals " on 09/11/08
Republicans and Democrats are BOTH to blame for "free trade" they should have been working on Fair Trade! McCain is NOT a Liberal, and he wants to force other countries to come in and take over our country for the benefit of big business, not the common worker. Why do Liberals make tax cuts for the middle class while conservatives only protect the rich if Liberals are to blame?

Unions are a joke. You are forced to pay money to people who do nothing then they make you miss work for something you may not care about. If the people running the companies were REAL Americans, unions would not be needed. For now we need them because the conservatives have given big business and foreign power too much of our rights and our money. Do not blame the Liberals, blame yourself for voting inside the box. we need REAL change, that means looking outside the Rep/Dem party. Together they are destroying America.

guest says "autos" on 09/10/08
Liberals have caused incredible damage to the country by not supporting American automakers. That was a bastion of the middle class. Milliions of our best jobs have been lost, with nothing comparable to replace them. They thought that the Japanese were more environmentally friendly, but most manufacturing is shifting to China, where there is NO ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION.

Liberals are in favor of opening the country's borders to the billions of poor from the whole world. Yet the manufacturing jobs were a good source of upward mobility for the working class. Mexican peasants may be willing to work for nothing, but their kids are not. They join gangs because there are no decent jobs.

It is a subtle class prejudice. People assumed that unions were obsolete. WRONG. We only got the legal right to organize in the '30s. Now we have in practice, lost it. We are all losing our health care, retirement everything. Thank you liberals. All these things were won by the blood and sweat of unions.

guest says "BAILOUT" on 09/10/08
GEE ISNT THIS GREAT, CANNT PAY YOUR BILLS ASK FOR A HANDOUT, I CANNT PAY MY MORTGAGE CAN I GET A HANDOUT TO, WHAT A MESS-THANKS IN PART TO THE IDIOTS IN WASHINGTON, AND THE GREEDY CEOS