[ close ]


Bg1

Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Ushering in Our Demise video

Published 02/21/09 Dustin Ensinger, with video by Craig Harrington - Print Article
E-mail - editor@economyincisis.org


Editor's note: This article was originally posted January 1, 2009.

On January 1, 2009 Americans mourned the fifteenth anniversary of the implementation of the deleterious “free trade” agreement that is the North American Free Trade Agreement, now it is just as important to look back and examine what an utter disaster it has been for the United States. 

 

Proponents of NAFTA asserted that the agreement would create hundreds of thousands of jobs in America, Canada and Mexico.  They promised to turn a small trade surplus with Mexico into a huge surplus that would benefit all three countries involved.  Illegal immigration would be a thing of the past as jobs in Mexico would be plentiful and lucrative.  Free traders talked openly of cheaper goods for American consumers with newfound purchasing power and unprecedented surges in exports to markets never before opened to U.S. products.  Of course, none of that panned out and those free trade advocates failed to mention what the biggest U.S. export would be:  good-paying American jobs. 

 

“NAFTA is really less about trade than it is about investment,” former presidential candidate Ross Perot once said of NAFTA.  “Its principal goal is to protect US companies and investors operating in Mexico. The text of the agreement is contained in two volumes covering more than 1,100 pages. Buried in the fine print are provisions that will give away American jobs and radically reduce the sovereignty of the US.” 

Prior to the implementation of NAFTA, the U.S. held a small trade surplus with Mexico of approximately $10 million.  By 2007, that surplus had turned into an astounding $91 billion trade deficit. With Canada and Mexico combined, the U.S. has taken a $24 billion trade deficit prior to NAFTA and turned it into a $190 billion deficit - a 691 percent increase.   

NAFTA was also supposed to usher in a new age of prosperity among the American people as thousands upon thousands of good-paying jobs were to be created through the increase in trade surplus that never quite came to fruition.  As you can imagine, just the opposite happened.  Each and every year more and more jobs are outsourced to Mexico where labor is incredibly cheap and environmental concerns are a mere afterthought.  The raft of jobs outsourced to Mexico forced American workers into direct competition with one another and drove down wages for all. 

Now Americans are forced to compete, not only with one another, but also with Mexican workers who are willing to work for much less than the average American.  In the U.S., the average factory worker makes roughly $18 per hour while his Mexican counterpart earns just $3 per hour.  This has encouraged a “race to the bottom” in which American companies are frequently relocating production facilities across the border.  Iconic American companies such as Coca Cola, Ford, RCA, General Motors, General Electric and Nokia have all opened up assembly plants in Mexico.  In fact, GE employs 30,000 Mexicans in 35 factories in the country.   

"NAFTA began it. We see nothing good about it," said Sue Levy, of United Auto Workers Region 1-D. "It's been used as a way to eliminate manufacturing jobs in the U.S. for low wages and no environmental protections. 

This race to the bottom has had a devastating effect on America’s manufacturing base.  Pre-NAFTA, the U.S. had 16.8 people employed in the manufacturing field.  By 2007, that number was down to just 13.9 million.  That accounts for over 20 percent of America’s manufacturing jobs over the past 14 years.  Those good-paying manufacturing jobs have been replaced by low-paying service sector jobs with little or no benefits.   

Another broken promise of NAFTA was the idea that the trade deal would be a boon for American farmers. Since NAFTA was implemented, 300,000 family farms in the U.S. have been put out of business. Overall, net farm incomes are down 13 percent.  

The failure of NAFTA could not be evidenced more clearly than through the influx of illegal immigrants that have entered the U.S. since 1993. Illegal immigrants in the U.S. have increased to 12 million today from 3.9 million in 1993, accounting for an overall increase of over 300 percent.   

Ross Perot warned of this problem when he said, “As manufacturing in northern Mexico expands, hundreds of thousands of Mexican workers will be drawn north. They will quickly find that wages in the Mexican maquiladora plants cannot compete with wages anywhere in the U.S. Out of economic necessity, many of these mobile workers will consider illegally immigrating into the U.S. In short, NAFTA has the potential to increase illegal immigration, not decrease it.”  

 

In all, NAFTA has clearly been an utter disaster that America would have been better off without.    “Clearly, NAFTA has never delivered on its promises,” former U.S. Rep. Phil English said of NAFTA.  “We need to redesign NAFTA so it's not a race to the bottom.”

Click Here For Solutions To America's Economic Problems:

 

Click here to contact your Representative in Congress.

Unless the above article is already copyrighted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License, EIC grants permission to use this article in whole or in part provided attribution is given, preferably in the form of a link back to EconomyInCrisis.org.

MORE OF TODAY'S NEWS | Comment on this Article | Read Comments


Spread this message with Digg, Del.icio.us, Reddit, or Stumbleupon, and subscribe to the RSS Feed to track articles

Register for newsletter

Bg2

Please Donate to EconomyinCrisis.org today



Please do your part, send a donation of $5, $10, $15 or any amount by PayPal or major credit card.

Bg2

Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2



Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter


Download our Podcast from iTunes

Itunes

Bg2

Additional Recommended Articles from the Archives


Bg2

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Bg2

Donate Today


Bg2

Comment on this article

Subject

Comment



Bg2

Article Comments From Readers

guest says "Hmmm...." on 02/23/09
Ross is/was a loss...

guest says "Ross Perot" on 02/21/09
I voted for him. Too bad, he was before his time.

guest says "Ross Perot's VP Pat Choate" on 02/21/09
Listen to him. He can fix our economic crisis. Very Smart Person.

gspencer says "Ross Perot" on 01/02/09
I was the only person in my family who voted for Ross Perot, and was verbally chastized by all of them. Ross Perot had the right message but he was the wrong messenger. Barry Goldwater's message was presented on TV by Ronald Regan 1964. Regan was the right messenger some years later.

The current published trade deficit numbers are understated false deficit numbers that include foreign dollars that are earned outside of this country and then spent in this country to acquire the title & ownership of US privately owned assets such as real estate, industries, breweries, hotels, factories, casinos, forests, agri-businesses, and financial institutions to improve our balance of trade. We are exporting the ownership of these properties in lieu of exporting products to get gold for our dollars. The dollars that we print to pay people in the countries that manufacture the things that we consume are bringing those dollars to the USA and redeeming these dollars for our things of value such as property instead of gold. We are exporting the title to our privately and corporately owned assets. Maybe we can sell our kidneys and other body parts to get money to feed our remaining family.

guest says "Republicans" on 01/01/09
With Ross Perot's loss I hear republicans remember in disdain that 'if we would have not voted for this 'spoiler' George Bush would have been president again'. Continually they go on again about tax cuts for business as though trade is based on profits and not economic principals such as 'people pay only with money they have' and that these ideals also have the ability to control prices and therefore jobs. In that vein there is potential for GREATER government profits and therefore LOWER PRICES. Maybe Al Gore should make another movie.