Illegal Chinese Paper Subsidies Hurting U.S.

Over 100 members of Congress, representing both chambers and parties, on Wednesday urged President Barack Obama to investigate illegal subsidies in the Chinese paper industry.
In a letter sent to the White House, lawmakers called the subsidies “significant and market-distorting," and warned that it is a critical time for an industry that is in desperate need of trade relief after years of facing unfair competition.

"America's paper industry is the most efficient in the world and is part of a supply chain that promotes sustainable forestry practices and good-paying jobs,” the lawmakers wrote in the letter. "This industry should not be asked to continue to compete on the unlevel playing field that China has constructed through heavy subsidization of domestic production."

Despite its lack of a competitive advantage in paper production and natural resources to make paper, China has surpassed the U.S. to become the world’s leader in that department in just under a decade, according to a an Economic Policy Institute report released earlier this month.

Since 2000, China has increased its paper output threefold, which seems like a daunting task given the fact that China’s forest base is the smallest in the world per capita, it has an already saturated domestic paper market and very little competitive advantage, even in labor costs.

Instead, China’s growth has been fueled through illegal subsidies, mostly in the form of tax breaks, loans - some of which are not expected to be paid back - and discounted electricity and raw materials, according to the report.

“From my time as a paper mill worker, I know firsthand the consequences of unfair trade practices. The paper mill I worked in for nearly 30 years shut down soon after I was sworn in as a member of Congress because our foreign competitors don’t play by the rules,” said Rep. Michael Michaud (D-ME).

From 2002 to 2009, the Chinese government poured $33.1 billion into what should be an unproductive industry. But, with the help of government subsidies, China was able to ride export-driven growth to become the world’s leading producer of paper products.

In the same time frame that China pumped $33 billion into its paper industry, U.S. employment in the industry fell 29 percent, from 557,000 workers to just 398,000. That amounts to a seven year total of 167,000 jobs lost for an annual average of nearly 24,000 jobs in the industry.

"Too many jobs and too many companies are being destroyed because of how China subsidizes production and violates free trade principles in paper manufacturing as well as in other industries," USW President Leo W. Gerard said in a press release.

If an investigation is launched, it would just add to a growing list of trade disputes between China and the U.S. under the Obama administration. In the past year alone, trade disputes over tires, steel tubing and grating, chicken, autos, aluminum forms, nylon products and salt have arose. In addition, U.S. lawmakers and manufacturers have pressured the Obama administration to force China to let its currency appreciate.

According to China’s Commerce Ministry, the number of trade relief-cases brought against China by the U.S. increased 53 percent in 2009.

"American workers are fed up with foreign subsidies and they need to know that the U.S. government is on their side" Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said in a news statement. "The investigation we are calling for is the first step toward achieving economic justice for our paper producers."

When you lose the Industrial foundation, in a matter of a decade, this is what happens. Even if we have all the natural resources, soon we have to buy the equipment and service from China to make anything.

Imagine where we will be in 30 years.

 

I don't think the US lost in within a decade. It probably started during Reagan presidency i.e. 2 decades at least.

 

Too late, I could not edit my post - more like 3 decades since the demise of Heathkits...may be.

Here is an interesting except from Economists

IMF: China’s exchange rate remains “substantially” undervalued.

China: How do you know?

IMF: Because your dollar reserves are rising rapidly.

China: That’s because the Americans are printing them so fast.

IMF: But your real exchange rate has barely strengthened since the late 1990s, despite all the progress you’ve made since then

China: That is an arbitrary date. The rate is up by more than 50% since 1994 and by 22% since 2005

IMF: You are quite right that comparison to any one point in time could be deceptive.

China: Yes.

IMF: But your surplus will be sizeable in the coming years. Look at our models!

China: We refute this view. Our surplus will keep falling in the next few months then level off. Equilibrium is at hand. The future will be different from the past. Your models are like shadows on the wall of a cave.

IMF: Can you lend us some money?

China: Would $50 billion do it?

 

"China’s growth has been fueled through illegal subsidies, mostly in the form of tax breaks, loans - some of which are not expected to be paid back - and discounted electricity and raw materials".

That's illegal. Tax breaks, discounted electricity and raw material price are all part of the industrial competitiveness provided to industry in a lot of countries. Why the US government improves their competitiveness by giving similar tax breaks, discounted electricity and raw material to their industry?

 

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times: Communist China is a criminal enterprise. Allowing them to drain away our wealth and our ability to defend ourselves is not "free trade." We are committing economic suicide. And, yet, that seems to be just fine with the Progressive Obama administration.

If you are not aware of the Progressive's plan for Global Socialism, you had better go aGoogling.

Bruce Bishop

 

Well, the world is queueing .. more like competing to do business and trade with the Chinese
so to say that they are criminal enterprise is a joke and if they are a criminal enterprise probably every country in the world is one and the US would be probably the biggest criminal enterprise in history (maybe not .. that would be the british). I don't think the US is allowing them to drain away their wealth but rather forced to concede to them in a capitalistic game introduced by the US themselves. As many experts have said "the Chinese are shrewd and trade savvy people".

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a><em> <strong><b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><img><div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is designed to prevent spam submissions. Unregistered visitor comments must await approval. Registered guests may log in to avoid this validation and to see their comments posted immediately.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States
This Work, Illegal Chinese Paper Subsidies Hurting U.S., by Dustin Ensinger is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.

Copyright © 2010 EconomyInCrisis.org

Letters to the editor

Sign up for our Newsletter

advertisement


Economic Crisis in US news, analytics, recommendations

Donate Today!






Download our Video Podcast from iTunes

Want to get involved? Sign up today!

Recent Comments