Is the World Trade Organization (WTO) Running Our Country?

doha round, WTO

Since its creation in 1995, the WTO has been a major obstacle in America’s ability to stay competitive in the world market. Our nation has become handcuffed— forced to increase free trade with countries that have few to no laws regarding workers’ rights, child labor or environmental protection. This means these countries can manufacture at a vastly lower rate, and American companies will have no choice but to do business with them in order to stay competitive.

The United States government has tried on countless occasions to protect our industries, but the  World Trade Organization (WTO) regularly rules against us. In fact, the U.S. loses nine out of every 10 cases brought to  the WTO—requiring changes to laws, and damaging the American economy.

There are many examples of WTO rulings against the U.S.:

  • In 2002, Brazil challenged U.S. federal subsidies on its imported Brazilian cotton. The WTO ruled against the U.S., and eventually gave Brazil permission to impose tariffs totaling nearly $830 million on American-made products such as cars, textiles, electronics and media.
  • In 2010, the U.S. attempted to ban uninspected chicken products from China that may be harmful or toxic. The WTO ruled against the U.S., stating that the ban was not in accordance with its regulations, and putting American consumers in harm’s way.
  • In 1995, Venezuela challenged U.S. regulations on imported gasoline. The WTO ruled against the U.S., preventing us from protecting our oil manufacturers.
  • In 2004, two Caribbean states challenged U.S. prohibitions on cross-border gambling, a ban put in place to protect against money laundering and other dangerous exposures. The WTO ruled against the U.S., stating the ban breached a global deal which liberalized trade in services — in this case being online casinos.
  • In 2010, anti-dumping duties imposed by the U.S. on Brazilian orange juice were challenged. The WTO ruled against U.S., opening the door for around $400 million dollars in Brazilian orange juice to be shipped there each year.
  • This year the WTO ruled against U.S. laws that protected American consumers by placing country of origin labels on certain foods. Now, thanks to the WTO, American consumers do not know where their food comes from, and are not able to protect themselves from potentially contaminated foreign food.

As long as the United States is ruled by the WTO, these problems are not going to go away. U.S. leaders need to request an emergency timeout from these trade pacts, a procedure for which the WTO has a clearly established process. Also, either Congress or the president could initiate an end to the United States’ WTO membership altogether.

America needs to take action immediately in order to stop the WTO from holding its hammer above the entire nation’s head.

An Open Letter Petition to Get the U.S. Out of the WTO

We petition the Obama administration and Congress to leave the World Trade Organization (WTO)!

It is instrumental in destroying our economy as it limits our ability to protect ourselves in all matters involving international trade. The WTO is a foreign, undemocratic organization whose charter, unbeknownst to most of us, even usurps our own Constitution, which has irresponsibly allowed them to dictate our international trade policies.

It is outrageous that we allow a foreign organization to do this. It has constantly and unjustifiably ruled against us when foreign countries have brought cases against us.

By signing the agreement with the World Trade Organization, the U.S. Congress agreed to concede a major portion of our sovereignty and usurp our democratic legislative process, including:

- Conforming U.S. laws, regulations and administrative procedures to the will of the WTO (Article XVI, p. 10)
- Subjecting all federal, state and local laws and practices that affect trade to international review by the WTO (Article XVI, p. 10)
- Allowing any WTO member country to challenge federal, state and local laws and practices as trade impeding (Section 2 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding)
- Taking all trade disputes to the WTO judiciary – giving the WTO final jurisdiction over all trade altercations. No appeal exists outside of the WTO (Section 2 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding)
- Empowering the WTO to enforce its rulings by imposing fines on the United States until we comply

The rights of America are subservient to the will of the World Trade Organization. Those who signed this lengthy agreement did not read the fine print or did not have the interests of America in mind. We must get out of the WTO now!

[signature]

5,179 signatures

Share this with your friends:

   

SafeSubscribe with Constant Contact
For Email Newsletters you can trust
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: diet | Thanks to lasik, online colleges and seo