We are Our Own Worst Enemy
Through the Actions of Many of Our Current Political Leaders
Currently over 150 nations have a value-added tax, which has been instrumental in their rampant rise from abject poverty to wealth and influence. The foreign VAT was introduced in 1954 by the French Tax Authority, almost a decade after World War II, in order to help Europe rebuild its countries ravished by war. The VAT provided rebates to European manufacturers, which helped subsidize their rebuilding efforts with money from American companies who were exporting to Europe. Today this foreign VAT is still the most important source of state finance in France, accounting for 50 percent of state revenues. This is why they are so extremely successful in relation to the size of their economy and their comparative productive output.
While the foreign VAT helped get European nations back on their feet, it simultaneously put the U.S. at a great competitive disadvantage. When the foreign VAT was implemented, the U.S. was more concerned with helping out other countries than itself, and as the world's superpower we were in a position to take on this role. Today, however, we can no longer afford to pay this foreign tax. The foreign VAT is instrumental in creating a huge trade deficit for us – running $1.4 million per minute (around $700 billion annually). In the past decade that deficit has accumulated to over $5 trillion – almost half of our national debt, now reaching towards $13 trillion. Our trade deficit equates to money flowing out of the U.S. which only comes back to the U.S. not to buy our goods but to buy our companies, land and other strategic assets. Meanwhile foreign countries utilizing their foreign VAT systems have their exports subsidized for their benefit at a rate as high as 19 percent in some countries, putting us at a most competitive disadvantage.
The U.S. desperately needs its own domestic value-added tax to place us on a level playing field with other countries instead of causing us to be so competitively disadvantaged. We have no tariffs and no defenses against their protective mercantilistic trading practices. Nations we ship to protect their companies assuring our exports don't under cut their competitive conditions, while these same nations can ship anything to our open borders free of charge and free of inspections. This is instrumental in putting thousands of our companies out of business. Our underfunded FDA only inspects 1 percent of the goods entering the U.S. We cannot afford to fund the FDA with our ever increasing debt and our lack of tariffs and taxes. Other nations hold U.S. products for numerous intensive inspections, making it harder to get what little goods we still make into the hands of foreign consumers. Other nations' industries are subsidized with American money, yet we do little to subsidize our own companies. When we do it is done in last minute bailouts that damage our companies reputations. While we waste resources penalizing U.S. companies, other nations are taking over whole industries.
A national VAT would allow the U.S. to cut the income tax, putting more money back into the pockets of Americans, which they could then put back into the economy. The VAT would also level the playing field with our competitor nations. Currently the VAT is one sided, it only benefits other countries as American dollars subsidize foreign industries. If we collected a VAT, the money could be used to rebuild America – creating jobs in our time of need.
When we step back and note the dramatic rapid descent of our economy, we see our country has fallen from being a superpower and is now a country that is:
*heavily in debt
*forced to operate with a destroyed industrial infrastructure
*liquidating thousands of our best companies
*rendered most uncompetitive with most other trading countries
*forced to live on imports to function and even exist
We must ask ourselves, why are our leaders not doing anything to stop it?
Are we blind?
Have we become stupefied by the uncontrolled, unchecked food and medicine that we import to live on? To a great extent, it is clear that our leaders must have been bought off by lobbyists who work against this country's greater good. They are working more for those who fund their campaigns for re-election than for the votes that put them in office. Certainly any well intended elected official whose interests are to better our country's conditions can see the folly of our ways. Surely they would want to stop our destructive plunge off an economic cliff.
Senator John McCain sponsored a bill to oppose our much needed national VAT. His bill was approved 84-13. Many experts have recognized that a European-style consumption tax is the most efficient way to rein in soaring budget deficits. Conservative stalwarts such as former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Paul Volcker - now an advisor of President Obama, Charles E. McLure - a tax economist in the Reagan administration and economist and former Reform Party Vice Presidential candidate Pat Choate have all endorsed the idea in one form or another. So why don't our Senators realize this? If an enemy wanted to see that our country continues to slide further into dependence and poverty, they would be taking the same actions taken by John McCain and these Senators by stopping anything that might solve our present problems.
We must ask the question, who are our elected leaders working for? Given our current economic position, it is obvious our representatives are not working for the best interest of our country.
When our fate and future rests in the hands of our own elected officials – who may be doing very detrimental things to our economy, and who may not be trained or qualified for the job – we need to begin questioning our leaders actions. While it may sound like a far out proposal, we should ask them whose best interest are they working toward. Do we need to set up polygraph tests to get to the truth? As important as this may be to protect us from the ill effects of our political leaders, these same guidelines should be implemented on lobbyist groups. Nearly all lobbyists are former elected officials or other former government employees.
We need a way to make our officials responsible for the current damage they are effecting on the country.
Click Here to Learn More About the Value Added Tax (VAT)

This Work, We are Our Own Worst Enemy, by Thomas Heffner is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works license.
Copyright © 2010 EconomyInCrisis.org
Sign up for our Newsletter
advertisement
Economic Crisis in US news, analytics, recommendations
Donate Today!
Recent Articles
Want to get involved? Sign up today!
Recent Comments
- As to the election, there is
1 hour 31 min ago - Why did not GE convert the
1 hour 37 min ago - Or you can stop importing
1 hour 52 min ago - To top it off, while living
1 hour 58 min ago - Democrats have been in
2 hours 44 min ago - This type of globalization is
13 hours 7 min ago - You mean lower cost labor
13 hours 18 min ago - More money printing to
13 hours 21 min ago - BIGuru,
You are absolutely
13 hours 57 min ago - As long as we are on the
19 hours 17 min ago



An interesting piece, but one lost to serious thought because of errors such as these:
“rendered most uncompetitive with most other trading countries”
---The World Economic Forum, the recognized arbiter of such issues, ranks the US #2 in competitiveness, worldwide.
If we are so good in competitiveness, how come we are importing crawfish, catfish, lithography equipment, LCDs, organic chemicals, base pharmaceuticals and electronics from China, Japan etc?
That would be something called "comparative advantage."
I'm sure Wikipedia has an article on it that you might find interesting.
In a nutshell, it says "do what you do best, and trade with others for what they can do well."
The key is "trade."
Without that, everything falls apart, very quickly.
It has not fallen apart for the Chinese since 80's. That is really a stupid idea made up by journalists or academics that does not work in the real world since 50's.
Introducing a VAT will accomplish nothing in terms of international competitiveness.
For example if we introduce a 10% VAT, then a domestic product which currently sells here for X will then sell here for 1.1X and it's price overseas would not change. Similarly, a foreign product which currently sells here for Y would then sell for 1.1Y and it's price overseas would not change.
The cost of goods and services in the US would rise by 10% and thus the purchasing power of the middle class, which is the primary generator of demand for goods and services, would be reduced by 10%. This would mean greater and increasing unemployment. I would only be in favor of a VAT if the proceeds were exclusively added to middle class take home pay. Then, since wages are about half of GDP, the cost of everything would rise by 10% but the middle class would have 20% more to spend. This would stimulate the economy and reduce unemployment.
NO VAT necessary if Congress and Obama would repeal all sales taxes and replace the revenue with a import tax (tariff)on imported labor and manufactured goods.
The following link takes you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the
Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
Mr. Steinsvold,
Just a bit of advice that you will never regret: Whenever you write something that you feel is worth saving, put both your name AND the date on it.
One of the reasons we study history is to avoid making the mistakes that have been made in the past and to look for models of behavior that were successful.
I recently re-read a short piece of literature by a couple of young men who shared some ideas similar to yours. Their names were Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. They were in their twenties when they wrote it, and although it was focused on the working people, who they called the proletarians, they had never worked and they didn't actually know any working people. Still, they thought they knew how to make the world a better place by applying their ideas to the country and the economy. The piece I am referring to is "The Communist Manifesto." You should read it. I think you will find you have much in common with its authors.
Bruce Bishop
Bruce Bishop,
Thank you for your comments on my essay: "Home of the Brave?".
As I envision a way of of life without money, we will gain economic freedom in addition to and without infringement on our present freedoms. The ONLY common denominator between a way of life without money and socialism/communism/Marxism is economic equality which, in my opinion, we desperately need here in the USA. Economic equality will eliminate poverty. It will also eliminate materialism which warps our sense of value and corrupts our system. It will also reduce crime dramatically.
The best way to motivate people is to allow them to do the work they love to do. One of the goals of a way of life without money is to provide everyone with the opportunity to find a match between their abilities and the opportunity to serve society. If training is necessary, a free education is provided. Every effort will be made for each individual to find the work they love doing. There will be no pressure. I believe everyone has an ability or talent they want to use for the benefit of society.
If we convert to a way of life without money, all debts would be forgiven. People with mortgages would now own their own homes. Skyrocketing credit card debts would be forgiven. Our national debt, which is in the trillions, would be forgiven since we owe most(?) of it to ourselves. Thus, our grandchildren will not be saddled with an enormous debt.
My essay: "Home of the Brave?" was written in 2005. However, I believe it is even more germane today. For reference, the link is:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm
John Steinsvold
"If we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.
Please note the dates at the top of the posts. I first replied to this article three months ago.
The Value Added Tax (VAT) was originally advanced as an alternative to the federal income tax and its 65,000 pages of rules and regulations.
The tax would be "buried" into the price of every product by adding a tax on the value that is added at each link of the supply chain. For example, a $1 candy bar might actually be a seventy seven cent candy bar with twenty three cents of value-added tax built in. We would pay our taxes to the federal government every time we made a purchase and the federal withholding from our wages and salaries would be discontinued. People earning below the poverty line would be issued a rebate by the government.
This would save us billions in IRS costs and would put thousands of IRS agents as well as tax accountants and lawyers out of business.
Liberals/Progressives simply want to increase the amount of money the federal government takes from us, the taxpayers. Their plan is to introduce the value added tax "in addition to" not "instead of" the federal income tax. This would give the federal government more power and more control over our lives.
The ultimate objective of the Liberal/Progressives is for the federal government to control all of the wealth in the country and to "provide for our needs" as they see fit. There would be a few "elites" in charge, and the rest of us would be passively productive, each according to his or her ability.
Bruce Bishop
Post new comment