Tax Reform and Tariffs

Finally, A Better Tax System that can be Clearly Understood and Easily Implemented

Our present tax system is obsolete, riddled with loop holes, unfair and demands change! America needs a new tax system that would cure all the ills that have plagued our current tax system for so long. Reforming taxes to include a national consumption tax would do just that.

Benefits for individuals — this new tax system will:

  • eliminate all income taxes on the first $100,000 earned, which will abolish income taxes completely for approximately 125 million Americans
  • be a simpler system, making paying taxes easier for everyone
  • benefit most Americans whose take home pay will increase
  • help bring back the jobs that have been lost to other countries whose foreign VAT penalizes our exports; this will dramatically level the economic playing field

Benefits for businesses — this new tax system will:

  • drop the corporate tax from 35 to 15 percent which would allow the U.S. tax rate to realign with international tax norms
  • allow us to subsidize our exports, like every other nation is doing now, advantageously, that has a VAT
  • allow American produced products to be more competitive, this will reawaken America’s industrial base and generate new American manufacturing on a much larger scale
  • Increase the advantages of producing, saving and investing in the U.S.
  • allow our companies to keep more of their profits, lessening their need to borrow money

Benefits for our government — this new tax system will:

  • eliminate the need for thousands of accountants and bureaucrats while reducing fraud
  • stimulate economic growth and lower unemployment in the United States
  • encourage businesses to remain in the U.S. instead of off-shoring, assuring that more tax revenue and jobs are kept in this country
  • increase revenue from foreign countries and companies, creating greater income for the U.S.; this will decrease our budget and trade deficits

Without a national consumption tax:

  • over 150 countries use a value-added tax (VAT), a type of national consumption tax for their benefit now — to our detriment because we don’t have one
  • foreign companies export products to our country tax and tariff-free with VAT rebates from their government, but U.S. companies are currently paying the foreign VAT to access their markets
  • U.S. companies annually pay an accumulative average of more than $550 billion to these foreign value-added tax systems; if we had a national consumption tax these charges would be negated
  • the U.S. presently has the highest statutory tax rate in the world, making outsourcing jobs and offshoring wealth a normal practice; unfairly creating massive individual profits at the expense of the American middle class (the Walmart family alone is worth as much money as 90-100 million other Americans combined)

Funding massive income tax reductions with a value-added tax is the most important change we can make to our tax system to dramatically increase economic growth and eliminate unemployment.

Now, for the First Time, a Tax Reform System Republicans and Democrats Can Get Behind!

Countries doing well in the global economy, nations like Canada, Japan and Germany, all have a value-added tax or VAT. Workers in both Japan and Germany earn higher wages than American workers and their economies are faring much better in the global recession. Germany had a trade surplus of $269.9 billion in 2013, much of which can be attributed to their VAT. In comparison, the U.S. ran a trade deficit of $558 billion that same year.

Approximately 160 other countries are successfully using a VAT, and the playing field will never be level until we have one, too. Because these countries use a VAT and we don’t, our exports are more expensive for them and their imports are cheaper than our domestically produced goods. This puts our factories out of business.

Germany, for example, uses a 19% VAT as a protective tariff against foreign manufacturers trying to sell to the German market. When American cars are exported from the U.S. to Germany, that 19% VAT is added to the price of the vehicle. Additionally, American companies pay an extra 19% in taxes in transportation costs, including docking, duties and insurance.

German products get rebated as they leave their home country and are not taxed upon entering the United States. This means the price of German-made products is lower, both in their home nation and here in America, than American-made goods. We must level the playing field if we want to be competitive.

A VAT protects domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive – imports will decrease. American goods, with a VAT, would become more competitive abroad because exports would be exempt from the VAT, lowering the cost for manufacturers – exports will increase dramatically and American manufacturing ability will increase. This means more domestic jobs and a resurgent middle class, and we will again produce more for ourselves (as it is now, 90% of products sold at Wal-Mart are foreign made).

A VAT would raise much more revenue than the corporate tax does. 2011 corporate taxes brought in $181 billion. In comparison according to the Urban Institute-Brookings Tax Policy Center, a 5 percent VAT would have yielded $277 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2011.

In 2013, the U.S. imported $440 billion from China alone. With a 5% VAT in place, we would have generated $22 billion, money that could have been used to put Americans back to work and lessen the nation’s need to borrow money from China.

The income tax could be dramatically decreased to offset the cost to consumers while still raising the necessary revenue for the government. With a VAT, exemptions can be put in place for certain necessities such as food, some clothing, medical items, insurance etc. to prevent a regressive tax.

A value-added tax would be good for the United States on every level. It subsidizes our exports, but makes the cost of manufactured imports more expensive. This would create a void that our manufacturing could fill.

Countries that are doing well in the global economy, nations like Canada, Japan and Germany, all have a VAT. Workers in both Japan and Germany earn higher wages than American workers, and their economies are faring much better in the global recession. Germany had a trade surplus of $210 billion in 2011, much of which can be attributed to their VAT. In comparison, the U.S. ran a trade deficit of $558 billion that same year.

Approximately 140 other countries are successfully using a VAT, and the playing field will never be level until we have one, too. Because these countries use a VAT and we don’t, our exports are more expensive and imports are cheaper than our domestically produced goods. This puts our factories out of business.

Germany, for example, uses a 19 percent VAT as a protective tariff against U.S. manufacturers trying to sell to the German market. When American cars are exported from the U.S. to Germany, that 19 percent VAT is added to the price of the vehicle. Additionally, American companies will pay an extra 19 percent in taxes in transportation costs, including docking, duties and insurance.

German products get rebated as they leave their home country and are not taxed to enter the United States. This means the price of German made products is lower in their home nation and higher here in America than American made goods. We must level the playing field if we want to be competitive.

A VAT protects domestic industries by making imported goods relatively more expensive – imports will decrease. American goods become more competitive abroad because exports are exempt from the VAT, lowering the cost for manufacturers – exports will increase dramatically and American manufacturing ability will increase. This means more domestic jobs and a resurgent middle class, and we will again produce more for ourselves (85% of products sold at WalMart alone are foreign made).

A VAT would raise much more revenue than the corporate tax does currently. 2010 corporate taxes brought in $156.7 billion. In comparison, an affordable 5 percent VAT would have brought in $600 billion by itself in 2010.

In 2011, the U.S. imported $399 billion from China alone. If a 5 percent VAT would have been in place, this could have earned $19.95 billion, money that could have been used to put Americans back to work and lessen the nation’s need to borrow money from China.

Income tax could be dramatically decreased to offset the cost to consumers while still raising the necessary revenue for the government. With a VAT, exemptions can be put in place for certain necessities such as food, some clothing, medical items, insurance etc. to prevent a regressive tax.

A value-added tax would be good for the United States on every level. It subsidizes our exports, but makes the cost of manufactured imports more expensive. This would create a void that our manufacturing could fill competitively.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: diet | Thanks to lasik, online colleges and seo